Really the only objections I’ve seen to Tooley’s evidential argument from evil is for theists to challenge Tooley’s use of inductive logic (but as a side note, Tooley points out that most Philosophers of Religion haven’t done their homework when it comes to inductive logic, and this is true)
Let’s just assume that Tooley’s inductive framework works. That is to say that inductive logic, particularly of the carnapian school, is a sound use of probability.
Given this, what other objections are there to Tooley’s inductive argument from evil? I’ve been looking through the literature and I can’t find anything
#Michael Tooley #Inductive Logic #Evidential argument from evil